DHARMA : HOW TO UNDESTAND PART 2


TRUTHFULNESS IS A VIRTUE BUT IN SOME  SITUATIONS IT MAY BE A SIN, AS WE HAVE SEEN ABOVE IN MUNNI’S CASE .KILLING IS A SIN ,SOMETIMES IT MAY BE THE RIGHT CHOICE , WE  HAVE NOTED BALAK’S MATTER IN THIS REGARD .IN  CERTAIN SITUATIONS UNTRUTH MIGHT BE SPOKEN: TO ESCAPE DEATH,TO SAVE LIVES OF FAMILY MEMBERS,TO PROTECT DHARMA , OCCASION OF MARRIAGE , AND IN JOKES.          
NOW BACK TO OUR PROBLEM.  ARJUN WAS IN A DILLEMA.IF HE KILLED YUDISHTHIR,HE HIMSELF COULD NOT LIVE ,SUCH WAS THEIR ATTACHMENT. ON THE OTHER HAND, IF HE DID NOT HE WOULD BE DISHONOURING HIS SECRET OATH. AS ALWAYS LORD HAD A SOLUTION !   “ADDRESS YOUR BROTHER AS’TU’[तू] ie DISRESPECTFULLY . DISRESPECT TOWARDS ELDERS IS EQUAL TO KILLING THEM.THIS IS MURDERING THEM WITHOUT ACTUALLY TAKING  THEIR LIVES. ARJUN DID SO.NOW A DIFFERENT DIFFICULTY! ‘I HAVE INSULTED MY ELDER  BROTHER I’LL COMMIT SUICIDE’ BHAGVAN ,AGAIN WITH A REMEDY,---  “ PRAISE YOURSELF FOR SELF PRAISE IS TANTAMOUNT TO TAKING ONE’S OWN LIFE.’’ ARJUN OBEYED. WITH PERSUASION BY LORD ,YUDISHTHIR ,TOO, WAS PACIFIED OF HIS SORROW. THUS BY CORRECT INTERPRETATION OF DHARMA, FRATRICIDE WAS AVERTED.HAD ARJUN KEPT HIS VOW ,HIS BROTHER WOULD HAVE DIED.
 WERE KRISHNA NOT THERE , AND YOU WERE THERE AS A DHARMA-GURU,HOW WOULD YOU HAVE RESOLVED THE ISSUE? TOUGH? SOME POSSIBLE CHOICES COULD BE:-1.YUDHISHTIR KNEW NOT ARJUN’S  SECRET OATH SO HOW COULD HE BE GUILTY; 2.KILLING YOUR KIN IS WRONG; 3.UNARMED CANNOT BE SLAIN; 4.ARJUN WAS DUTY BOUND TO PROTECT  HIS BROTHER,FOR IN WAR IT IS THE DUTY OF THE SOLDIERS TO KEEP THE KING AWAY FROM HARM’S WAY; 5.DUE TO HIS WOUNDS YUDHISHTIR WAS NOT   IN   A   BALANCED   STATE  OF  MIND ,THEREFORE,  SPOKE  ILL  OF  GANDIV BOW,UNINTENTIONALLY..etc.  NO MATTER WHAT OUR ANSWER,  ,IT  IS SUBJECT TO ERROR . REMEMBER  KAUSHIK MUNI  ,EVEN  SPEAKING THE TRUTH  WAS  NOT CONSIDERED RIGHT.   WHEN IN A SITUATION TO DO OR NOT TO DO, WHAT ARE WE TO DO !  WE MUST TAKE CARE OUR ACTION IS CONSONANT WITH:- LAW OF THE LAND[राज मत]], SCRIPTURAL INJUNCTIONS[भगवत मत] , VIEW OF THE LEARNED ,SADHUMAT][ साधु मत], PUBLIC OPINION[ लोकमत]]. IF WE ARE UNABLE TO GET AN ANSWER, THEN,IN PLACE OF GOING INTO MENTAL ACROBATICS ,WE CAN  LEAVE OUR DEPENDENCE ON DHARMA AND TAKE REFUGE IN OUR LORD.THAT IS HIS INVITATION TO ARJUN IN GITA-- 18/66 18/66 [गीता ].  THE SAME IS REPEATED IN BHAGVAT TO UDHAV-- 11/12/14-15. .THE  BEST DHARMA FOR HUMANS IS THAT WHICH FOSTERS DEVOTION FOR GOD. DHARMA THAT DOES NOT KINDLE LOVE FOR GOD’S STORIES AND PASSTIMES[लीलाएं] IS A BURDEN AND TOIL..BHAG.1/2/5-8.. REAL DHARMA  IS WHAT GOD HIMSELF HAS REVEALED FROM HIS VERY MOUTH FOR SIMPLE SOULS..BHAG.11/2/34.  THE GIST OF IT IS TO  LEAN ON HIM ONLY. ABANDONMENT OF DUTIES IS NOT BEING ADVOCATED.  WHAT IS  ADVISED IS THAT ALL ACTIONS ARE TO BE OFFERED TO HIM.THIS WAY  WE WILL LEARN TO DEPEND ON HIM ,SHIFTING OUR DEPENDENCE FROM DHARMA/ ACTIONS TO GOD.WHEN FACED WITH A DILEMMA ,WE WILL NOT HAVE TO CHOOSE FROM A NUMBER OF ALTERNATIVES OR WEIGH THE CONSEQUENCES OF PARTICULAR  ACTIONS. WITHOUT JUDGING WHAT IS RIGHT OR WHAT IS WRONG  WE WILL DO OUR DUTY OFFERING IT TO HIM ,CONSIDERING HIM TO BE THE DOER,WITH RELINQUISHMENT OF THE FRUIT,AND WITH NO ATTACHMENT WITH THE ACTION. ARJUN DID JUST THIS WHEN DIRECTED BY BHAGVAN TO KILL KARNA WHO WAS UN- ARMED AND WAS TRYING TO PULL HIS CHARIOT’S  WHEEL OUT OF MUD. ARJUN DID NOT GO INTO THE MORAL ISSUE. THIS IS WHAT TAKING REFUGE IN GOD MEANS ! WE ARE FREED OF ALL SINS. ALL THAT IS REQUIRED IS  “THINK OF HIM AND DO  YOUR  DUTIES ,EVEN BATTLE’’---gita  8/7.
 AGAIN IT IS CLARIFIED , WE ARE NOT TO CEASE ACTION.IT IS NOT POSSIBLE,  WITHOUT IT WE CANNOT EVEN EXIST ; NATURE COMPELS ACTION--- gita 3/5 . A LITTLE CHOICE WE DO HAVE---WE CAN CHOOSE TO ACT WITH SAKAMTA सकामता  ie  WITH A DESIRE FOR FRUITS ,OR WITH NISHKAMTA निष्कामता  ie. NO DESIRE FOR FRUITS. FORMER NEED NOT BE EXPLAINED FOR WE ARE ADEPTS AT IT SINCE THE BEGINNING BECAUSE WE ARE ETERNAL,AND HAVE DONE THIS IN EVERY HUMAN LIFE TIME TILL NOW----DONE ACTIONS WITH AN EYE ON FRUIT. LATTER IS ELABORATED IN GITA : NO ATTACHMENT WITH ACTOIN,NO DESIRE FOR FRUIT ,NO FEELING OF DOER- SHIP; SANKHYOGI  FEELS  NATURE IS DOING ALL; DEVOTEE OFFERS ALL ACTIONS  TO GOD,  HE,BEING A MERE INSTRUMENT ; KARMA YOGI WORKS FOR OTHERS. SAKAMTA  BEGETS THE FRUITS OF ACTIONS   ie. BONDAGE---- IT GIVES FRUITS WHICH ARE TO BE BOURNE IN THIS LIFE-TIME OR OTHER LIVES (GITA 18/12 ) . IT IS A REASON FOR RE- BIRTHS .  NISHKAMKARMA ON THE OTHER HAND GIVES LIBERATION .   “THEREFORE,ARJUN,THINK OF ME ALWAYS AND FIGHT.WITH MIND AND REASON THUS SET ON ME,YOU WILL DOUBTLESS COME TO ME.’’ -- GITA.8/7.       
 IN OUR ILLUSTRATION, KAUSHIK MUNI WAS SAKAM,ATTACHED TO TRUTHFULNESS,AND IT’S FRUITS.SO WAS BALAK . BOTH GOT FRUITS  OF THEIR ACTIONS ie. HELL AND HEAVEN RESPECTIVELY . BUT,IN ORDER NOT TO GET INTO BONDAGE,WE ARE T0 ACT AS PER KRISHNA’S DIRECTIONS: WITHOUT DESIRE FOR FRUIT,WITHOUT ATTACHMENT ,OFFERING ALL ACTIONS TO HIM WE ARE TO DO OUR SCRIPTURE-ORDAINED DUTIES ,AS PER VARNASHRAMA DHARMA [वर्णाश्रम धर्म]  ---GITA 9/27-28 . HANUMANJI  KILLED THOUSANDS  OF DEMONS [राक्षस गण],WITH HIS MIND ON RAM ,WITH INTENTION THAT HE WAS DOING RAMS WORK,AND HE WAS NOT DOER [[कर्त्ता ]. HANU MANJI EARNED NO SIN. THUS,  NOT THE ACT BUT THE  MENTAL STATE BEHIND THE ACT,IS IMPORTANT . DOING ACTOINS  IN ACCORDANCE WITH GITA WE CAN ATTAIN  LIBERATION.......FOLLOWING KRISHNA IS THE HIGHEST DHARM धर्म , WHICH IS TO BE ACHIEVED,KEPT AND MAINTAINED . DHARMA FULL OF MERCY AND TRUTH,AND KNOWLEDGE WITH TAPA CANNOT PURIFY A HEART DEVOID OF DEVOTION AS FIRE BURNS WOOD,SO DEVOTION BURNS SIN[पाप]--- BGAGVATभागवत11/14/21 -22. BHISHMA EXPLAINS TO DURYODHAN,  “WHERE-EVER DHARMA IS KRISHNA IS. ’’THE CONVERSE IS ALSO TRUE: WHERE KRISHNA IS DHARMA IS ALSO THERE. GET KRISHNA, DHARMA WILL COME AS A NATURAL CONSEQUENCE .WHEN WE HAVE WITH US BRAHMAGYAN[ब्रहम ज्ञान] ,ie. THE FULL OCEAN,WILL WE LOOK FOR A GLASS OF WATER ? Gita 2/46. ‘’ I AM THE ABODE OF ETERNAL DHARMA’’ ,KRISHNA DECLARES.--GITA 14/27
THE WHOLE PURPOSE OF DHARM IS TO ATTAIN GOD.ONCE WE HAVE  HIM WE HAVE ALL..NO NEED OF DHARM. WHY? DHARM IS IN KRISHNA. FOR INSTANCE, I GET A BIG MANSION AS A GIFT ,WHICH  HAS  MANY ROOMS INCLUDING A DRAWING R00M. HAVE I TO TRY FOR THIS DRAWING ROOM AGAIN. NO. I ALREADY HAVE IT WITH THE MANSION. HAVING KRISHNA IS HAVING DHARM, TOO. GOPIS, HAVING NO REGARD FOR VEDIC DHARMA ,HAD ADULTEROUS LOVE FOR KRISHNA. YET THEY ARE EPITOMES OF BHAKTI[भक्ति]--- NARAD BHAKTI SOOTRA नारद भक्ति सूत्र.

 TILL WE HAVE NOT FULLY REALIZED HIM,WHAT ARE WE TO DO ? WE ARE TO LEAN ON HIM ONLY,LIKE A  KITTEN OF CAT. MANY  DOS AND DONTS   OF DHARMA-KARMA  WE CAN SKIP. WE ARE TO FOLLOW THOSE RULES THAT MAKE US INTROVERTS,AVOID THOSE THAT MAKE US  EXTROVERT;PRECEPTS PERTAINING TO PURITY,CLEANLINESS  CAN BE AVOIDED.... 11/10/27भागवत.   DHARMA IS TO BE FOLLOWED ONLY TO THE EXTENT IT DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH BHAKTI [भक्ति]DEVOTION .KRSHN-.STRIVERS SHOULD HAVE THEIR MIND ON HIM ALWAYS,AND HIM ONLY, BECAUSE VEDAS,YOG,TAP,GYAN,DHARM(वेद ,योग, तप, ज्ञान, धर्म ), ALL ARE FOR KRISHNA.---BH.1/2/28,29 .HE IS ABOVE ALL.
 THE DHARMA TO BE FOLLOWED IS OUR OWN DHARMA,IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR STATION IN SOCIETY AND STAGE IN LIFE [वर्णाश्रमधर्म ]. SOMEBODY ELSES DHARM WILL LAND US IN SIN AND DISREPUTE---. GITA 2/33.  EVEN IF LESS VIRTUOUS,OUR DHARM IS BEST,IT IS GOOD EVEN DYING WHILE FOLLOWING IT .---GITA 3/35,18/47..     

BHAGVAT OPINES THAT NO ILL CAN BEFALL A PERSON WHO GIVES UP HIS DHARMA FOR BHAKTI .THERE IS NO GAIN FOR ONE WHO FOLLOWS HIS DHARMA ONLY AND DOES NO WORSHIP(भक्ति )--1/5/17..IF BY CHANCE A GOD-WORSHIPPER COMMITS ANY SIN ie.TURNS AVERSE,  HE IS STILL NOT CAUGHT IN THE CYCLES OF BIRTHS AND REBIRTHS ---1/5/19. A BHAKT(ONE WHO WORSHIPS GOD EXCLUSIVELY) CAN NEVER FALL DOWN OR BE DESTROYED---GITA 9/30-31, 6/40  .

WHY THEN FOLLOW DHARM WHICH IS SO COMPLEX AND INTRICATE ? WHY NOT SURRENDER TO HIM ONLY!


No comments:

Post a Comment